I have a behind the scenes 'spat' with some politician right now on another account. We disagree. Karma is NOT poverty, unless you were rich b4 and lost your wealth somehow. Our politicians spend more time picking out their suits 4 church service than they do paying attention in church, or reading the bible. Jesus got every place without an SUV, why should I be sad that I don't have one? Paul was imprisoned 4 being a Christian, Paul lost everything to be a Christian, who am I? The bible tells me that it's easier 4 a camel to get through the eye of a needle than it is 4 a man with wealth to get into heaven. WHY? Because ones a man accomplishes his dreams and gets his wealth, he forgets all about Jesus. That' why Jules James made so many people cry. He's a PASTOR!!! Yes he's a pastor, but since gaining power and wealth, has he been as faithful? Of course not, because had he truly been a Christian Pastor, he wouldn't have hurt so many people. What I know is that MANY St Maarten politicians DO NOT believe in God or the Bible. THEY DON'T!! No matter how many times you see them in church on Sundays. St Maarten is all about appearances. They go to church, because they have to consider the congregation vote, and it's great P.R. to be considered a 'church person' and Christian, but they're not. They realize that the church is simply another outlet to get votes. SO they go to church as a show. I sit at home and read my Bible I guess because I won't be begging the vote in 2014. You'll see a lotta them in church in 2014, but don't look at the suit, look at the CHARACTER. Not what you HEARD, what you KNOW!
judith roumou, caribbean government, jamaican government, guyanese government, trinidad and tobago government, anguilla government, saba government, statia government, st kitts government, nevis government, st martin government, st maarten government, dominica government, antuiga and barbuda government, u.s. virgin island government.
Monday, December 30, 2013
Friday, December 27, 2013
ST MAARTEN ALREADY GETTING READY.....DUTCH ELECTION 2014
They are deep in the gutter, and they already have handfuls of mud to sling, but the politicians will be doing most of the mudslinging behind the scenes. They are good at delegating the mudslinging to their assistants, and to random negroes that they helped along the way.
Let's be honest, their are some true government dogs out there. People who've gotten a crumb, and now are die hard loyalist, no matter what these politicians do.
They are satisfied with their crumb, so why shouldn't you be satisfied?
It's these mostly illiterate, and semi-literate people who will be doing the government's 'grassroots' campaigning for them. Some honestly CAN'T read, so everything is told to them and they go out and repeat it as gospel. No research, no second opinion, no nothing.
Everybody is talking about "clean battles", when behind the scenes they are loading the ammunition.
Most politicians don't even realize most of the criticism comes from their own party.
E.g. Dr Lloyd Richardson......The U.P. and D.P. have never divulged any negative feelings about Doctor Lloyd to me, when I get all the "diss"-information on Dr Lloyd, it is ALWAYS his own party.
When you are in politics and government and you come to me with a story or you send one of your minions, you know precisely what I do. That's why I COLLECT a LOT of info but blog very little details. Its about the "source" and the "motive".
Someone in the 'media' said that I allowed politicians to 'use' me, to get their stories out.
LOL!!! At least they're not using me to ensure a 'residency permit'. I am no politicians pal or buddy, and I don't pretend to be, and they can't convince me that they are.
Save your sympathy for those poor and in need, these politicians don't need your sympathy, although they love it, because they love playing the victim as the collect $100.000+ per month both over AND under the tables.
People need to realize that the majority of our so called 'local' press are NOT local. So when they criticize the government, it's easy for the Government to find a 'flaw' in their residency paperwork, so they get deported, or they just dump their body in a fishtrap somewhere.
The so called 'local' media should be proud that real St Maarteners are standing up, and taking on Government doing what they could never do, but instead they want to feel threatened.
Since I've started blogging, I don't know how many I've assisted in teaching and setting up blogs in St Maarten.
Long after I'm gone, there will be blogger criticizing the government.
And there will be bloggers who will make me seem tame.
Let's be honest, their are some true government dogs out there. People who've gotten a crumb, and now are die hard loyalist, no matter what these politicians do.
They are satisfied with their crumb, so why shouldn't you be satisfied?
It's these mostly illiterate, and semi-literate people who will be doing the government's 'grassroots' campaigning for them. Some honestly CAN'T read, so everything is told to them and they go out and repeat it as gospel. No research, no second opinion, no nothing.
Everybody is talking about "clean battles", when behind the scenes they are loading the ammunition.
Most politicians don't even realize most of the criticism comes from their own party.
E.g. Dr Lloyd Richardson......The U.P. and D.P. have never divulged any negative feelings about Doctor Lloyd to me, when I get all the "diss"-information on Dr Lloyd, it is ALWAYS his own party.
When you are in politics and government and you come to me with a story or you send one of your minions, you know precisely what I do. That's why I COLLECT a LOT of info but blog very little details. Its about the "source" and the "motive".
Someone in the 'media' said that I allowed politicians to 'use' me, to get their stories out.
LOL!!! At least they're not using me to ensure a 'residency permit'. I am no politicians pal or buddy, and I don't pretend to be, and they can't convince me that they are.
Save your sympathy for those poor and in need, these politicians don't need your sympathy, although they love it, because they love playing the victim as the collect $100.000+ per month both over AND under the tables.
People need to realize that the majority of our so called 'local' press are NOT local. So when they criticize the government, it's easy for the Government to find a 'flaw' in their residency paperwork, so they get deported, or they just dump their body in a fishtrap somewhere.
The so called 'local' media should be proud that real St Maarteners are standing up, and taking on Government doing what they could never do, but instead they want to feel threatened.
Since I've started blogging, I don't know how many I've assisted in teaching and setting up blogs in St Maarten.
Long after I'm gone, there will be blogger criticizing the government.
And there will be bloggers who will make me seem tame.
mr al wathey photos judith roumou. al wathey and Joe richardson are known as "the wicked and wild wind" in st maarten politics
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Torrential rains and flooding occured on the small islands of St Lucia and Dominica killing 5 people
Torrential rains and flooding occured on the small islands of St Lucia and Dominica yesterday for the Christmas holidays. 5 are reported dead, one being a police officer. Reports are continuing to come in from Dominica and St Lucia with more reports of catastrophic damage and loss of homes. Anyone from the area, needing more info can click on Dominicanewsonline.com
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
BEHIND THE SCENES: FRANS RICHARDSON UNITED ST MAARTEN PARTY LAUNCH DECEMBER 22 2013 PHOTOS JUDITH ROUMOU
FRANS RICHARDSON UNITED ST MAARTEN PARTY LAUNCH DECEMBER 22 2013!!! To no one's surprise, and the critics and detractors were waiting. I attended Sunday's event, but the attacks against Mr Richardson had already started online, so I got my popcorn, because I knew it would be interesting. There's a lot of enemy political sharks circling Richardson right now, because...well...he's made a lot of enemies. Now understand if you were JESUS in the St Maarten government you'd have a lot of enemies, but Richardson has really pissed many people off. This doesn't mean that they wouldn't try to form a coalition with him in 2014, but right now the swords have already been drawn.
Richardson made many enemies as William Marlin's number 2 on the National Alliance slate for many years. Ofcourse, as always in these situations, the egos begin to emerge. Richardson started negotiating behnd the scenes with other political parties, and other potential political parties, but there are no true friends in government, so the word quickly got out. Marlin it seemed felt the heat of Richardson's popularity, but as the leader was not about to cede power to anyone, especially his number two. Marlin acted like Richardson was getting to big for his britches. Richardson showed obvious discontent with his leader, and although Marlin and Richardson's National Alliance Party got the most votes, Richardson defected, became an Independent, joined with Patrick Illidge and Romain Laville. This act devastated the National Alliance, and put them as the opposition, although they had garnered the most votes. The Illidge, Richardson, Laville alliance became so tight, that people began to refer to them as The Three Amigos (The Three Pals), When I told Romain that the Three Amigos would soon become "The Three Enemigos" ( The three enemies) he laughed at me on camera.
They even had nicknames for each other. This sooooooo infuriated many, that many felt that the "Monster" calling itself the Three Amigos, and who were also planning to set up their OWN party in 2014, had to be burnt before it could grow and start to reproduce. Theo Heyliger uncle was the one to make the approach about a video with Patrick Illidge taking money. I was only interested in an un-altered video, so he couldn't work with me. But then Patrick Illidge turned COLD on the National Alliance. And although ALL evidence pointed to Theo Heyliger and co. as the ones who released the video, Patrick Illidge always appeared to believe that it was the National Alliance. Then on St Maarten's day, I was approached by a United People's Party advisor who said. "The National Alliance released that tape, because they felt that the "New Party" could only hurt the Alliance and cost them votes. Evidently, and Kendall Dupersoy DID tell me the same thing in government, the National Alliance felt that they and the Independents attracted the same demographic, and that the Alliance would be hurt, not the DP or the UP.
The government fell again. At this point, I witnessed Richardson and Laville go at it in Parliament. I tried to record the video, but Robbie the security did his best to block me, so I only got audio. Then The Three Amigos became The Three Enemigos. Patrick and Romain seemed to align, and Richardson was on his own. Some said that because Illidge was under an investigation for the Bada Bing Scandal, and Romain Laville were involved in his own legal battles, including a battle over a gun pulling incident with Jules James, and another suit, where Romain Laville was suing Theo Heyliger.
It's been know for months now that Richardson was going to start his own Party, and for months online, even before he uttered a word, the attacks began.
Who are these detractors?
The Nationala Alliance, who felt that he'd screwed them over.
The other "Amigos" who he dropped at a dime when there was a hint of scandal.
The United People's Party are seeing the potential for Richardson to take their 'younger demographics' vote. The DP with Sarah Wescot Williams, well her top boys Leroy and Roy are not going to be running in 2014. Advising-yes,running-no.
Sarah will have to align, some say Theo and her have made arrangements to put her in the #2 spot, some say that THAT will never happen. I love to read, and I love to write so I'll stay tuned to the developments when it comes to this latest party, and I'll blog my opinions about it.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
ST MAARTEN GOVERNMENT BUSINESS IS CONDUCTED ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY IN BROTHELS, WHY ARE SURPRISED AT THE BADA BING SCANDAL?
Do you know what ‘irony’ is? It’s St Maarten Police, standing by Theo Heyliger’s illegal whorehouse “El Capitan” the site of felonious activity (Prostitution is a crime, that’s bypassed through ridiculous permits for members of government-that’s why our government owns and runs the brothels) and handing out tickets to unsuspecting locals for misdemeanors. El Capitan whorehouse is owned by Theo Heyliger, leader of the United People’s Party and his family. Part of the reason Roland Duncan had to go down, was because with his “Hypnotique” connections he was planning to revolutionize the pimp game, which means brothel owners like Parliamentarian Sylvia Meyers, and her boss Theo Heyliger would have had some competition. So they went after Parliamentarian Patrick Illidge, Roland Duncan’s benefactor….and the rest is history. Another historical note is that the brothel above, “El Capitan” is St Maarten’s oldest whorehouse, it used to be owned by Theo Heyliger’s grandfather the great stove and fridge slavemaster Claude Wathey. Seeing its historical value, it’s only a matter of time before it becomes a museum and local attraction.
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
VIDEO: PATRICK ILLIDGE TAKING MONEY JAAP V.D. HEUVEL BADA BING
A hearing was based on the Landsverordening Vervolging Politieke Gezagdragers Ordinance Prosecution Political Authority, a law that came in to place following the October 10th 2010 country status proclamation of St Maarten which states that persons in political ofifce including memers of parliament, cannot be prosecuted like any other citizen. MP Patrick was caught on camera at the Bada Bing brothel receiving money via brothel owner Jaap Van Den Heuvel. No clear evidence has been provided, Patrick insists it was a loan, the theories abound. I'll give a very in depth blog to come
Monday, December 16, 2013
DOCTORS IN GOVERNMENT: FIRST DO NO HARM!! photos judith roumiu
Hippocratic Oath
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Hippocratic Oath (disambiguation).
The Hippocratic Oath is an oath historically taken by physicians and other healthcare professionals swearing to practice medicine honestly. It is widely believed to have been written by Hippocrates, often regarded as the father of western medicine, or by one of his students.[1] The oath is written in Ionic Greek (late 5th century BC),[2] and is usually included in the Hippocratic Corpus. Classical scholar Ludwig Edelstein proposed that the oath was written by Pythagoreans, a theory that has been questioned because of the lack of evidence for a school of Pythagorean medicine.[3] Of historic and traditional value, the oath is considered a rite of passage for practitioners of medicine in many countries, although nowadays the modernized version of the text varies among them.
The Hippocratic Oath (horkos) is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. It requires a new physician to swear upon a number of healing gods that he will uphold a number of professional ethical standards.
Contents
[hide]Oath English Translation[edit]
English translation, version 1[edit]
Apollo Physician and Asclepius and Hygieia and Panacea and all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will fulfill according to my ability and judgment this oath and this covenant:
To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to my parents and to live my life in partnership with him, and if he is in need of money to give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my brothers in male lineage and to teach them this art — if they desire to learn it — without fee and covenant; to give a share of precepts and oral instruction and all the other learning to my sons and to the sons of him who has instructed me and to pupils who have signed the covenant and have taken an oath according to the medical law, but to no one else.
I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.
I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in this work.
Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free or slaves.
What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep to myself holding such things shameful to be spoken about.
If I fulfill this path and do not violate it, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame among all men for all time to come; if I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite of all this be my lot.[4]
English translation, version 2[edit]
I swear by Apollo, the healer, Asclepius, Hygieia, and Panacea, and I take to witness all the gods, all the goddesses, to keep according to my ability and my judgment, the following Oath and agreement:
To consider dear to me, as my parents, him who taught me this art; to live in common with him and, if necessary, to share my goods with him; To look upon his children as my own brothers, to teach them this art; and that by my teaching, I will impart a knowledge of this art to my own sons, and to my teacher's sons, and to disciples bound by an indenture and oath according to the medical laws, and no others.
I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.
I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.
But I will preserve the purity of my life and my arts.
I will not cut for stone, even for patients in whom the disease is manifest; I will leave this operation to be performed by practitioners, specialists in this art.
In every house where I come I will enter only for the good of my patients, keeping myself far from all intentional ill-doing and all seduction and especially from the pleasures of love with women or men, be they free or slaves.
All that may come to my knowledge in the exercise of my profession or in daily commerce with men, which ought not to be spread abroad, I will keep secret and will never reveal.
If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and practise my art, respected by all humanity and in all times; but if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my life.
Modern use and relevance[edit]
The oath has been modified multiple times. One of the most significant revisions was first drafted in 1948 by the World Medical Association. Called theDeclaration of Geneva, it was "intended to be a self-conscious rewriting of the Hippocratic Oath, reaffirming Hippocratism in the face of the shame and tragedy of the German medical experience". The Third Reich had deemed that there was such thing as a life not worth living, and this was seen in their medical experimentation on Jews throughout WWII.
In the 1960s, the Hippocratic Oath was changed to "utmost respect for human life from its beginning", making it a more secular concept, not to be taken in the presence of God or any gods, but before only man.
While there is currently no legal obligation for medical students to swear an oath upon graduating, 98% of American medical students swear some form of oath, while only 50% of British medical students do. [6] In a 1989 survey of 126 US medical schools, only three reported usage of the original oath, while thirty-three used the Declaration of Geneva, sixty-seven used a modified Hippocratic Oath, four used the Oath of Maimonides, one used a covenant, eight used another oath, one used an unknown oath, and two did not use any kind of oath. Seven medical schools did not reply to the survey. In France, it is common for new medical graduates to sign a written oath.[7][8]
In the United States, the majority of osteopathic medical schools use the Osteopathic Oath as well as the Hippocratic Oath. The Osteopathic Oath was first used in 1938, and the current version has been in use since 1954.
In 1995, Sir Joseph Rotblat, in his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, suggested a Hippocratic Oath for Scientists.
See also[edit]
- Declaration of Geneva
- Declaration of Helsinki
- Hippocrates
- Hospital Corpsman Pledge
- Human experimentation in the United States
- Medical ethics
- Nightingale Pledge
- Nuremberg code
- Oath of Asaph
- Oath of the Hindu physician
- Osteopathic Oath
- Physician's Oath
- Primum non nocere
- Seventeen Rules of Enjuin
- Sun Simiao
- White Coat Ceremony
References[edit]
- Jump up^ Farnell, Lewis R. (2004-06-30). "Chapter 10". Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 234–279. ISBN 978-1-4179-2134-8. p.269: "The famous Hippocratean oath may not be an authentic deliverance of the great master, but is an ancient formula current in his school."
- Jump up^ The Hippocratic oath: text, translation and interpretation By Ludwig Edelstein Page 56 ISBN 978-0-8018-0184-6 (1943)
- Jump up^ Temkin, Owsei (2001-12-06). "On Second Thought". "On Second Thought" and Other Essays in the History of Medicine and Science. Johns Hopkins University. ISBN 978-0-8018-6774-3.
- Jump up^ The Hippocratic Oath: Text. Translation. and Interpretation. by Ludwig Edelstein, Supplements to the Bulletin of the History of Medicine. no. 1943).
- Jump up^ National Library of Medicine 2006
- Jump up^ Dorman, J. (September 1995). "The Hippocratic Oath". Journal of American College Health 44 (2): 84-88. ISSN 0744-8481. Retrieved 9-20-2013.
- Jump up^ Sritharan, Kaji; Georgina Russell, Zoe Fritz, Davina Wong, Matthew Rollin, Jake Dunning, Bruce Wayne, Philip Morgan, Catherine Sheehan (December 2000). "Medical oaths and declarations". BMJ323 (7327): 1440–1. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1440. PMC 1121898. PMID 11751345.
- Jump up^ Crawshaw, R; Pennington, T H; Pennington, C I; Reiss, H; Loudon, I (October 1994). "Letters". BMJ 309 (6959): 952. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6959.952. PMC 2541124. PMID 7950672.
- Notes
- The Hippocratic Oath – an article by The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (h2g2).
- The Hippocratic Oath Today: Meaningless Relic or Invaluable Moral Guide? – a PBS NOVA online discussion with responses from doctors as well as 2 versions of the oath. pbs.org
- Lewis Richard Farnell, Greek Hero Cults and Ideas of Immortality, 1921.
- "Codes of Ethics: Some History" by Robert Baker, Union College in Perspectives on the Professions, Vol. 19, No. 1, Fall 1999, ethics.iit.edu
External links[edit]
- Hippocratic Oath, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (h2g2).
- Hippocratic Oath – Classical version, pbs.org
- Hippocratic Oath – Modern version, pbs.org
- Hippocratis jusiurandum – Image of a 1595 copy of the Hippocratic oath with side-by-side original Greek and Latin translation, bium.univ-paris5.fr
- Hippocrates | The Oath – National Institutes of Health page about the Hippocratic oath, nlm.nih.gov
- Tishchenko P. D. Resurrection of the Hippocratic Oath in Russia, zpu-journal.ru
Navigation menu
Languages
- Afrikaans
- العربية
- Azərbaycanca
- Беларуская
- Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
- Български
- Bosanski
- Brezhoneg
- Català
- Čeština
- Dansk
- Deutsch
- Eesti
- Ελληνικά
- Español
- Esperanto
- Euskara
- فارسی
- Français
- Gaeilge
- Galego
- 한국어
- Հայերեն
- Hrvatski
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Íslenska
- Italiano
- עברית
- Kurdî
- Latina
- Latviešu
- Lietuvių
- Magyar
- Bahasa Melayu
- မြန်မာဘာသာ
- Nederlands
- 日本語
- Norsk bokmål
- Polski
- Português
- Română
- Русский
- Shqip
- Slovenčina
- Slovenščina
- Српски / srpski
- Suomi
- Svenska
- Tagalog
- Türkçe
- Українська
- Tiếng Việt
- 中文
- Edit links
- This page was last modified on 14 December 2013 at 20:31.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)